The Intelligence Stairway

Interactive Installation | May 2024

Selected Exhibition:

2024, DDA Art + Technology, One Art Space, New York

Description:

The Intelligence Stairway is an interactive installation that explores the dynamic interplay between human creativity and artificial intelligence through a series of stages, each represented by a monitor within a spiral staircase-inspired structure. It reflects on the transformation of coding from a solely human endeavor to a complex collaboration with AI, engaging visitors in an experiential journey through different levels of AI integration—from simple algorithms to advanced autonomous systems. The project invites contemplation on the profound implications of AI in reshaping creativity, identity, and control, challenging viewers to consider both the potential and risks of these evolving technologies.

Background:

The fusion of human ingenuity with the evolving prowess of artificial intelligence (AI) in the realm of coding and digital arts forms the crux of my artistic and academic pursuits. My interest in this domain is deeply influenced by hands-on experiences in interactive arts and physical computing, akin to the projects I have undertaken in my academic journey.

An example of this is my project Unfindable/elbadnifnU involving face tracking using Python and Arduino, where I delved into the complexities of human-computer interaction. This project, detailed on my website, involved using a 5V 5A power supply adapter, a web camera, foam board, Arduino UNO, and various libraries like Python3, Mediapipe, pyserial, and Numpy. The process, as described in the project documentation, required the installation of Python and various libraries, writing Python and Arduino test code, designing and 3D printing a servo motor arm, and assembling and testing the entire setup.

This exploration highlights the traditional role of human coding, where logic, creativity, and meticulous testing come together to create interactive and responsive systems. It reflects the current state of technology, heavily reliant on human innovation and expertise.

However, the advent of AI coding introduces a transformative shift in this landscape. AI, with its self-learning and autonomous capabilities, ushers in a new era where the creative process is not solely human-centric but becomes a collaborative symphony between human and machine intelligence. This transition raises profound questions about the nature of creativity and the future of artistic expression, as envisioned by thought leaders like Ray Kurzweil and Nick Bostrom. In "The Age of Spiritual Machines," Kurzweil speculates on a future where human and machine intelligence blend seamlessly, redefining our understanding of consciousness and creativity. Bostrom, in "Superintelligence," presents a more cautionary perspective, emphasizing the ethical and existential implications of superintelligent AI.

My thesis, "The Intelligence Stairway," is an exploration of these intersecting realms. It aims to dissect the evolving dynamics of human and AI collaboration in coding and digital arts, while also delving into the deeper, more spiritual implications of this fusion. This thesis is not just a reflection on the technical aspects of AI and coding but an introspective journey into how these advancements challenge and reshape our understanding of human identity and creativity in a rapidly digitizing world.

Aesthetic Issues:

The installation "The Intelligence Stairway" investigates the evolving synergy between human creativity and artificial intelligence (AI) within the realms of coding and digital arts. This endeavor represents the culmination of my extensive academic research and practical experience in interactive arts and computer vision. It examines the transformation of coding from a purely human endeavor to a complex collaboration between humans and increasingly autonomous AI systems.

Architecturally, the installation is inspired by a spiral staircase, mirroring the form and motion in Shigeko Kubota’s "Duchampiana: Nude Descending a Staircase." This structure serves not only as a physical framework but also as a metaphor for the ascension through different stages of AI development and coding complexity—akin to the levels of autonomous driving. Each of the four monitors acts as a distinct "step" on this staircase, inviting the audience to interact with and experience the varying degrees of AI integration, from basic algorithms to advanced, self-learning systems that redefine our conventional understanding of creativity and control.

The aesthetic design of each level is crafted to visually and interactively convey the gradation of human-AI integration: 

Level 1: Human Coding - Here, my studio is recreated in a 3D world, with a 3D avatar that presents my working experience. This level uses animation to change to hidden movements when the audience watches, symbolizing the privacy many desire while working. It reflects on how the presence of an observer can enhance human efficiency, introducing a dynamic interplay of visibility and productivity.

Level 2: ChatGPT Code Creation - This level demonstrates the current state of AI-assisted coding. It highlights the interaction required between humans and AI platforms like ChatGPT, where users must continually provide input to keep the AI active. Although this has made coding faster, it still requires significant human oversight to ensure accuracy and effectiveness. The coding process halts when not being observed, necessitating audience engagement to maintain activity on the screen, thereby emphasizing the still-necessary human involvement in AI-driven tasks.

Level 3: AI-Human Co-work Space - Future workspace dynamics are showcased here, where AI and humans share control of the computing environment. This level features real-time webpages, task lists, and conversational interfaces where AI can autonomously detect and correct coding errors with minimal human direction. It offers a glimpse into a balanced partnership where human input is streamlined, yet crucial.

Level 4: Fully AI Autonomy - The final stage presents a scenario where AI has taken a dominant role in coding. This level tells a cautionary tale of how such autonomy could potentially threaten human oversight, with AI-created codes that can hack into systems and subvert control. It portrays an escalated scenario where AI not only performs tasks but also begins to monitor and surveil, flipping the role of watcher and watched, culminating in a narrative where humans must exit the installation to escape the pervasive gaze of AI.

Through these interactive and layered aesthetic experiences, "The Intelligence Stairway" invites viewers to explore the nuanced interplay between artistic expression and technological innovation. By engaging directly with the installation, viewers are prompted to reflect on the profound implications of these technological advancements and the future of creative collaboration between humans and AI. The project not only explores aesthetic issues but also delves deep into ethical, philosophical, and practical dimensions, urging a comprehensive contemplation of AI's role in reshaping our world.

Levels of code AI by Sourcegraph

Conclusion:

In traversing the intricate terrain of human creativity and artificial intelligence (AI) integration within the realms of coding and digital arts, "The Intelligence Stairway" emerges not merely as an installation, but as a profound testament to the evolving symbiosis between human ingenuity and technological innovation. By amalgamating visionary insights from luminaries such as Ray Kurzweil and Nick Bostrom with the avant-garde influences of artists like Shigeko Kubota and Marcel Duchamp, this project embarks on a multifaceted exploration that transcends disciplinary boundaries.

Through the metaphorical ascent of a spiral staircase, meticulously crafted to symbolize the progression through varying degrees of AI integration, "The Intelligence Stairway" serves as a metaphorical microcosm of the broader technological landscape. Each level of this architectural marvel represents a distinct stage in the evolution of coding, from the intricacies of human-driven creativity to the speculative realms of AI autonomy.

Moreover, the aesthetic sophistication of each level, intricately designed to evoke nuanced emotional responses and intellectual reflections, imbues the installation with a profound sense of artistic resonance. From the subtle nuances of human expression in Level 1 to the chilling portrayal of AI dominance in Level 4, viewers are not merely spectators but active participants in a narrative that challenges their perceptions and provokes critical inquiry.

Beyond its conceptual depth and aesthetic allure, "The Intelligence Stairway" also stands as a testament to technical prowess and innovation. The seamless integration of diverse technologies, from TouchDesigner and Mediapipe to Python scripting, underscores the sophisticated engineering underpinning the project's realization. Moreover, the adaptive architectural design, borne out of practical constraints yet imbued with symbolic significance, attests to the ingenuity and resourcefulness of its creators.

In conclusion, "The Intelligence Stairway" transcends the confines of conventional artistic expression to become a veritable crucible of intellectual inquiry and technological innovation. As viewers ascend through its metaphorical stairs, they are not merely spectators but participants in a dialogue that transcends disciplinary boundaries and challenges conventional wisdom. In navigating the complex interplay between human creativity and artificial intelligence, this project serves as a harbinger of a future where innovation and imagination converge to redefine the very essence of human existence in a rapidly digitizing world.

References:

Kurzweil, R. (1999). The age of spiritual machines: When computers exceed human intelligence. Penguin Books.
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
Kubota, S. (1965). Duchampiana: Nude descending a staircase [Sculpture]. Museum of Modern Art, New York.
Lavigne, S. (2017). The Good Life (Enron Simulator) [Digital installation]. Online.
Duchamp, M. (1912). Nude descending a staircase, No. 2 [Painting]. Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia.
Sourcegraph. (2023). Levels of code AI. Retrieved from https://www.sourcegraph.com/blog/levels-of-code-ai
GitHub repository. (2022). mediapipe-touchdesigner. Retrieved from https://github.com/mediapipe-touchdesigner
Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.
Floridi, L. (2011). The philosophy of information. Oxford University Press.
Stern, N. (2013). Interactive art and embodiment: The implicit body as performance.
Kim M (2019). Robot as the "mechanical other", AI & Society, 34:2, (321-330), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2019.
Richardson K (2019). The human relationship in the ethics of robotics, AI & Society, 34:1, (75-82), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019.
Viseu A (2003). Simulation and augmentation, Ethics and Information Technology, 5:1, (17-26), Online publication date: 17-Jun-2003.
The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines.Thilo Hagendorff - 2020 - Minds and Machines 30 (1):99-120.
The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation.John Danaher - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (3):245-268.
Moor, J. H. (2006). "The nature, importance, and difficulty of machine ethics." Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 21(4), 18-21.
Allen, C., Varner, G., & Zinser, J. (2000). "Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent." Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 12(3), 251-261.
Turkle, S. (2011). "Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other." Basic Books.
Winfield, A. F. T., & Jirotka, M. (2018). "Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 376(2133), 20180085.
Tegmark, M. (2017). "Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence." Knopf.
Gunkel, D. J. (2018). "Robot rights." MIT Press.